Skip to main content

Medical Device Companies in Texas - Breakdown by City

In a previous post I described the geographic distribution of pharmaceutical companies within Texas. I went back to the same directory of Texas-based pharmaceutical and medical device companies [see disclaimer below, *] and, this time, took a look at the geographic distribution of companies working in medical devices. The list [see technical note below, **] contains a total of 171 medical device companies - almost twice the number of pharmaceutical companies listed. Here is how they are geographically distributed: 


The number in each wedge = the number of medical device companies in that city. "Other" consists of Bryan/College Station (4 companies), Athens (3), Corpus Christi (2), El Paso (2), Amarillo (1), Beaumont/Port Arthur (1), Longview (1), Lubbock (1), Midland(1), Mineral Wells (1), and Waco (1).

As with pharmaceutical companies, medical device companies were heavily concentrated in the four largest metropolitan areas of Texas - Houston, Dallas/Fort Worth, San Antonio and Austin. However, Austin clearly comes out on top - by a pretty large margin, in fact. This is in stark contrast to the in-state distribution of pharmaceutical companies, in which they come in at third place. Now, the directory contains a disclaimer stating that it is not intended to be an exhaustive list [see note below, *], so these rankings should be considered a rough estimate at best. Still, these numbers beg the question: what might account for Austin's particular prowess in the medical device sector? 


- Isamu Hartman, PhD


------------------------------------

* I just noticed the following disclaimer within the directory: "The company listings in this directory are provided as a broad, representative sample of Texas companies in three major areas of the biotechnology industry. This directory is not a comprehensive source of all biotechnology or health-related companies in the state. Due to space limitations, the Office of the Governor Economic Development and Tourism division is unable to include all relevant firms in this document." Thus, whatever interpretations I make based on it should be considered a rough estimation at best.

** Technical note: the "Medical Devices and Instruments" list within the 2012 Texas Biotechnology Company Directory contains a total of 218 companies; however, those companies were classified under one of three different categories: Medical Devices, Medical Equipment & Supplies, and Biological Products. For the figure shown here, I generated and used an edited list that consists only of companies classified as "Medical Devices." This list (in Excel format) can be downloaded here.





Comments

  1. Wonderful post. Medical device companies not consistent with 21 CFR Part 820, and other material regulations, make themselves powerless against FDA implementation hones. The unreliable part is that the FDA doesn't let you know how to work as an agreeable companies. You have the adaptability to execute the essential methodologies to fulfill the appropriate regulations and help them with your agreeability drills. Nonetheless, you're relied upon to completely comprehend the plan of the regulations and meet those desires paying little heed to your size and assets. thanks all~ Barbara W.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Medical equipment & supplies are needed by basically two main groups of consumers - doctors, medical professionals and lab technicians, and those who require, or are in the position to provide, constant in-home medical care.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good information. This text about medical device companies in Texas showed how medical devices are important. Review is really interesting. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Comics About Patents (A Work In Progress)

Back in January and February of 2018, I spent some time creating two four-panel comics about the process of 1) obtaining patent protection, and 2) monetizing those patent rights by licensing them. I drew the comics to serve as an illustration of concepts that I often find myself explaining to others in the course of my work. I've already shared these comics through  Twitter  and  Facebook  (click on either of link to see more of the creative process!). However, I thought I'd share them with my blog's readership as well. Please enjoy! I'm really hoping to reignite this project at some point in the future and create more episodes. (Click on the images below to enlarge) Episode 1: Episode 2: - Isamu Hartman

The Big Fish: Texas-Based Biomedical Companies listed on NYSE and NASDAQ

[Monday, 22 April 2013:  I added Hanger Inc. (HGR, NYSE), an Austin-based prosthetics and orthotics company I had originally missed, to the list] [Thursday, 02 May 2013:  fixed the location of Hanger Inc. (HGR, NYSE) - changed from Dallas to Austin] I have another few posts coming up on Texas-based awardees of the SBIR program. But first, a quick digression. +Levi Shapiro  asked me the following question during a phone conversation we had earlier today:  who are the "Big Players" in the Texas biomedical industry that are listed in the major stock exchanges? I knew about Luminex (LMNX, NASDAQ) off the top of my head. Other than that, though, I really had no idea. Following the advice of +Lauren Nise  , I used LexisNexis (courtesy of the UT Dallas Eugene McDermott Library ) to generate a list of publicly traded biomedical companies headquartered in Texas that are listed in either NYSE or NASDAQ. Here are the companies I found: (Open spreadsheet as a se...

Developing Software: What Should Academic Researchers Keep in Mind? (Part 1)

Having never had any experience in software development when I entered the world of academic technology transfer back in 2013, I never expected to learn so much in the intervening years about software licensing and commercialization. It turns out that, even working in technology transfer at a medical institution, I encounter a surprising number of software-based technologies. Furthermore, with the recent rise in the use of AI/ML applications in biomedical research, the frequency at which I am presented with software in my work is only increasing.  Below is my first attempt at summarizing what I have learned thus far in managing software assets within an academic technology transfer setting. None of what I write here should be viewed as constituting legal advice. Furthermore, if you are an academic researcher, you should most definitely rely on the guidance you receive from your own institution’s own technology transfer office when navigating these waters! However, I’m sharing my ob...