Skip to main content

Conversation with David Sym-Smith


David Sym-Smith, Partner at Addison, TX-based venture capital firm Mobility Ventures, is a 20+ veteran of the mobile industry. I met David about two months ago at the kick-off event for Health Wildcatters, a Dallas-based healthcare-oriented seed accelerator where David serves as a startup mentor (see my previous post about the kick-off event here). At the event we had a brief but fascinating conversation on mobile technologies and their impact on healthcare. We got together a few weeks later at a local Starbucks for a follow-up chat. I found the ensuing conversation so interesting that I asked David whether I could post a synopsis of our conversation on my blog; David kindly acquiesced. Below are some highlights from what David had to say: 

Indoor mapping is the next frontier in mapping. Companies involved in online maps and mobile navigation (e.g., Google, Apple, etc.) are all actively working on providing maps and navigation capabilities for indoor spaces (malls, stadiums, etc.) and tracking the locations of individuals within them. Unlike GPS, there is no standard method for building an indoor positioning system; as such, there are a variety of solutions currently out there. Most use some combination of information garnered from sensors built into mobile phones and from existing WiFi networks. There is one method that utilizes the Earth’s geomagnetic field (Indoor Atlas). The coming widespread availability of precise indoor spatial tracking will greatly enhance the power of existing “self-quantifying” tools that track one’s physical activity and status in real time (e.g., Nike+). This technology can be applied to a variety of medical uses. One example:  real-time tracking of, say, one's elderly mother within her own house. The data would be mined for changes in patterns of activity that might signal trouble, (e.g., did she get out of bed, etc.) and this information can be streamed to her healthcare provider(s) as well as to her adult children who may be worried about her health status. David says he would pay good money for such a service, and he is confident many other people would as well. 

Expect to see a trend of non-healthcare companies taking their existing technologies and applying them to healthcare. The reason – healthcare is where the big money is. Consider a company like [mapping and navigation company] Garmin, which is already active in sports and athletics. The technologies Garmin has already developed and deployed for athletics are very applicable to medicine (e.g., remote-monitoring). Because the healthcare market is potentially more lucrative, it would make a lot of sense for a company like Garmin to repackage their existing technologies for medical applications. 

Academic technology transfer. David pointed to Stanford as a model for academic technology transfer done right:  stick to licensing fees only – at a low percentage – to make it easy for businesses to bear the cost of paying for IP. This approach has paid off handsomely for Stanford. [Note: after my conversation with David I came across a great writeup on the success of Stanford's technology licensing efforts here -IH]

Startups and seed accelerators. David has been involved with screening applicants for the inaugural class of Health Wildcatters, the new Dallas-based healthcare-oriented seed accelerator. He feels the most important resource organizations like Health Wildcatters can provide to startup companies is access to mentors with deep connections in the industries they are attempting to enter. In addition to providing expertise, advice, and guidance, mentors often provide startups with introductions to potential investors and in some cases their first paying customers (particularly within a B2B setting). The actual funding that startup companies will receive from Health Wildcatters is, he feels, of secondary importance. 

– Isamu Hartman, PhD

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Medical Device Companies in Texas - Breakdown by City

In a previous post  I described  the geographic distribution of pharmaceutical companies within Texas. I went back to the same   directory of Texas-based pharmaceutical and medical device companies  [see disclaimer below, *] and,  this time,  took a  look at the geographic distribution of companies working in medical devices. The list [see technical note below, **] contains a total of 171 medical device companies - almost twice the number of pharmaceutical companies listed. Here is how they are geographically distributed:  The number in each wedge = the number of medical device companies in that city. "Other" consists of  Bryan/College Station (4 companies),  Athens (3),  Corpus Christi (2),  El Paso (2),  Amarillo (1),  Beaumont/Port Arthur (1),  Longview  (1),  Lubbock  (1),  Midland (1),  Mineral Wells  (1), and  Waco  (1). As with pharmaceutical companies...

Developing Software: What Should Academic Researchers Keep in Mind? (Part 2)

In Part 1   of this essay, I discussed three learning points I'd gained from my encounters with faculty-developed software in my work as a technology transfer officer at an academic medical research institution. Those points were as follows:  Patents aren't a necessary prerequisite for commercializing software Be deliberate in your use of third-party code If you are going to release your source code publicly, consider doing it under a restrictive open source license When I finished writing it, I knew I had more to say on the topic. You can read Part 1 here . Below is my continuation. 4 - Figuring out the ‘thing’ that’s going to be licensed An important part of handing off a software-based technology from university to private industry is to first figure out exactly what is being handed off. This can be tricky! I’ve discovered that software, as a commercial asset, can take many forms. The licensing professional can bring a lot of clarity to the negotiations by making sure both ...

Finding the Innovators: Recipients of Healthcare-Related SBIR Awards

The SBIR (Small Business Innovation Research) program is a federal initiative that provides funding for small businesses to engage in research and development.  Tracking SBIR awardees, I believe, should be a great method for identifying entrepreneurial, innovation-oriented players within the Texas economy.  I decided to identify which Texas-based companies in the healthcare/biomedical industry have received SBIR awards in the recent past, and how much funding they have obtained. The SBIR website contains a well-curated database of all current and past awardees (for visualizing national trends, be sure to check out their amazing "Graphical Tools" page). I pulled up a list of all SBIR awards given to Texas-based companies between 2008 and 2012 that were sponsored by the Department of Health and Human Services – thus limiting the search results to grants awarded to companies in the healthcare/biomedical industry. The list consisted of 186 grants awarded to 85 different co...