Skip to main content

HHMI Investigators in Texas

Which city in Texas has the highest concentration of talent in academic biomedical research? There is probably no definitive way to answer this question, but one good "quick and dirty" method would be to compile a list of Texas-based Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Investigators. Why? Because HHMI Investigators typically constitute a large portion of the 'superstar' biomedical researchers at any given institution. Below is a list compiled from data I obtained from the HHMI website in October 2013:



It turns out Dallas leads the list by a long shot, due solely to UT Southwestern Medical Center. Having been a UT Southwestern employee for the past seven years I knew it had a strong research program, but I was still surprised to see it dominate the local competition to the degree that it does in this particular metric (for what it's worth UT Southwestern also has five Nobel laureates among its faculty - four active, one emeritus).

This made me curious:  how does UT Southwestern rank in the number of HHMI investigators nationally? Pretty well, it turns out:


UT Southwestern ties for no. 8 with Columbia and Johns Hopkins. Not bad at all.

And how does Texas rank as a state? See below:


Fourth place behind CA, MA, and NY. Again, not bad.

Is there a relationship between a state's prowess in basic biomedical research and the robustness of its local biomedical industry? Presumably, although I would guess the latter isn't necessarily an inevitable outcome of the former. Still, I can't help but be excited about these numbers and what they suggest about the potential of Texas's, and particularly Dallas's, biomedical industry.


- Isamu Hartman, PhD

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Developing Software: What Should Academic Researchers Keep in Mind? (Part 2)

In Part 1   of this essay, I discussed three learning points I'd gained from my encounters with faculty-developed software in my work as a technology transfer officer at an academic medical research institution. Those points were as follows:  Patents aren't a necessary prerequisite for commercializing software Be deliberate in your use of third-party code If you are going to release your source code publicly, consider doing it under a restrictive open source license When I finished writing it, I knew I had more to say on the topic. You can read Part 1 here . Below is my continuation. 4 - Figuring out the ‘thing’ that’s going to be licensed An important part of handing off a software-based technology from university to private industry is to first figure out exactly what is being handed off. This can be tricky! I’ve discovered that software, as a commercial asset, can take many forms. The licensing professional can bring a lot of clarity to the negotiations by making sure both ...

Medical Device Companies in Texas - Breakdown by City

In a previous post  I described  the geographic distribution of pharmaceutical companies within Texas. I went back to the same   directory of Texas-based pharmaceutical and medical device companies  [see disclaimer below, *] and,  this time,  took a  look at the geographic distribution of companies working in medical devices. The list [see technical note below, **] contains a total of 171 medical device companies - almost twice the number of pharmaceutical companies listed. Here is how they are geographically distributed:  The number in each wedge = the number of medical device companies in that city. "Other" consists of  Bryan/College Station (4 companies),  Athens (3),  Corpus Christi (2),  El Paso (2),  Amarillo (1),  Beaumont/Port Arthur (1),  Longview  (1),  Lubbock  (1),  Midland (1),  Mineral Wells  (1), and  Waco  (1). As with pharmaceutical companies...

Texas-Based Pharmaceutical Companies - Breakdown by City

[Monday, 18 March 2013:  I just noticed that the  directory  I discuss in this post contains the  following disclaimer : "The company listings in this directory are provided as a broad, representative sample of Texas companies in three major areas of the biotechnology industry. This directory is not a comprehensive source of all biotechnology or health-related companies in the state. Due to space limitations, the Office of the Governor Economic Development and Tourism division is unable to include all relevant firms in this document." Thus, whatever interpretations I make based on it should be  considered a rough estimation at best.  -IH] I've written a synopsis of the  2012 Texas Biotechnology Industry Report  (see previous post), but I'm going to hold off on posting it here until it first comes out on the next issue of the Postdoc Informer, the UT Southwestern postdoctoral community's bimonthly newsletter. In the meant...